Abstract:
The researcher thought of this topic at a time when it became apparent that the
country is at an impasse. The situation is not progressing, despite or maybe because of
the political players and the political context. The government remains ineffective,
and the poor remains poor, if they did not become poorer. This observation of the
status quo was compared with two scenarios, with which few events would
necessarily follow:
Scenario one. If the government were effective, there would be popular
support for its policies, resulting to development, because it would necessarily follow
that people would exert effort to meet government goals, and at the same time,
opposition would not be able to muster enough anti forces to do something.
Scenario two. If the government were ineffective, the people would not
support its policies, leading to either inaction or the search for alternatives of the
people, which would cater to their needs and could also include the absence of
political participation.
It is clear than the government is ineffective with its policies, as found by the
paper. Therefore it seems illogical why no one is successfully challenging the
ineffectiveness of the government. Wouldn't it be logical to think that if the
government is ineffective, there would be resentment from the people, contributing to
a strong anti-PGMA force, either leading to a change in policies or a change of
president in power. The main goal of this thesis is to find out what contributes to this plateau of
inaction, what the turning point in justice is, and in under what conditions will make
people mobilize and at what level of suffering. At the end of the day, effectiveness
draws popular support, maintenance of power, and development. Ineffectiveness
draws otherwise.
The study provides an analysis of a current Philippine Situation, so as to
determine the flaws of the prevailing system of governance. Needs as perceived by
the urban poor and the government are analyzed to determine their congruence with
one another. Government policies are analyzed vis-a-vis national economic policies,
to measure the effectiveness of the government itself Public policies, the role of the
government and how it responds to its constituents, what people want and expect
from the government, specifically PGMA's administration, are studied for this thesis.
The researcher recognizes the role of government in providing services to the
urban poor, and sees it as the most encompassing in scope and with the most ability to
alleviate the problems of the urban poor.
The researcher conducted interviews in the Blumentritt railway area, so as to
derive firsthand information on the views and perception of the urban poor with
regard to governance and government policies.
The researcher also attempted to look at the policy making and
implementation of the Philippine government through key informant interviews.
Unfortunately, such efforts were almost futile. Repetitive rescheduling and faxing, even visits to government offices, did not produce favorable results. The researcher
even found herself probed and questioned quite rudely by supposedly esteemed
government employees.
For the rest of the literature, the researcher opted to resort to government
documents readily available for public consumption. Information was derived not
only from government archives, but from independently-published journals and
newspapers.
The researcher learned, through interviews with the urban poor from the
Blumentritt, that the urban poor believe that the government isn't exerting enough
effort, if exerting any, to respond to their needs. They believe that the government
knows what the urban poor needs are, but because of self-preservation and political
agenda, policies targeted for the urban poor's well-being are not given focus by the
government, in terms of policy-making and implementation. This is the perspective
of the urban poor.
The researcher also learned, through an interview with a government official
from the National Economic and Development Authority, that government efforts
result to no avail because of internal inefficiencies, i.e. mistargeting and
undercoverage, as well as problems of funding. The government official concedes that
there is a problem of corruption, yet has asserted that not all branches of government
are corrupt and that there are those who actively try to look after the well-being of the
urban poor. It is realized that PGMA's public policies for the urban poor cease to be
effective, as national economic policies contradict the goals of domestic urban poor
policies, defeating the latter's purpose and effect It is also concluded that the goals
set by government are not of long-term benefits, but for short-term alone, only
proving to be detrimental for the welfare of the urban poor later on. This is supported
by the views of an economics professor of the University of the Philippines Manila.
The researcher is a believer of social justice and equity, and strives to the
promotion of the welfare of the masses. She advocates such ideals in her own way, as
a student leader. It is therefore of much value to her to find a way to improve the
current situation of the urban poor through public policies.