Para po! Para Kanino? A Critical Comparative Analysis of the Effects of the PUV Modernization on Consolidated versus Unconsolidated Jeepney Operators and Drivers Associations

Abstract

The Jeepney is a staple not just of Philippine transportation but of culture and history as well, however, in recent times, the policy of the PUV Modernization which was presented to modernize our transportation and fix the system, has been criticized by jeepney drivers and people alike. Using Lefebvre’s Critical Urban Theory and Meadowcroft’s insights in proactive governance, the researchers therefore aimed to study the effects and the chaos of the PUV Modernization Program on the jeepney drivers of Metro Manila and the differences between consolidated and unconsolidated drivers, aiming to study the gaps in the policy. The researchers interviewed 30 chosen jeepney drivers, 15 consolidated and 15 unconsolidated, using a random sampling method and utilized a validated mixed-method survey questionnaire, interviewing drivers using quantitative scales and qualitative questions. It was found that unconsolidated drivers made significantly more than consolidated drivers and held more disciplinary programs. Interestingly, most drivers were found to be critical of the PUV Modernization Program because of the lack of benefits and lack of reach from the government in bridging the transition for the drivers.