Abstract:
Political dynasties have been a longstanding issue in the Philippines, with their
detrimental effects on the social, economic, and political systems becoming increasingly evident.
While existing research focuses on their persistence and economic implications, there is a gap in
understanding how these dynasties are challenged and defeated. This paper seeks to address this
gap by exploring the case of a Silang, Cavite mayor who won against a political dynasty in local
elections. With the question, ‘How do political dynasties end?’, the study aims to analyze the
roles of the political actor, civil society organizations, voters, and broader socio-political factors
in toppling dynasties. Grounded in Hara’s (2019) theory of local progressive politics, the study
employs resource mobilization, rational choice, and political leadership frameworks. A
phenomenological approach with a combination of KII, IDI, and thematic analysis was used.
Findings revealed the defeat of the political dynasty was a result of the political will and positive
characteristics of the political actor as opposed to the dynasty, resource mobilization of political
machinery for socio-political aims, rational voting, and desire for change based on past
experiences, and political opportunities arising from critiques of the dynastic administration and
the proposed solutions by the challenger.